Yesterday I saw a posting on a fellow PR blogger's site talking about a highly successful PR tactic that was used by Senator McCain in his bid for the White House.
The New York Times turned down an editorial by Senator John McCain, so the McCain camp leaked it to the Drudge Report, which not only published the editorial but made a news event out of the turndown. The result is that more people are seeing the editorial than readers of The New York Times -- and the Times looks bad. The negative to this, of course, is that the Times will get even, but the McCain camp apparently feels that the Times won't be fair in any event. The McCain camp has burned its bridge to the Times with style.Today, I received an e-mail talking about the controversial cartoon in the New Yorker featuring Barack Obama in Islamic dress beside a burning US flag in the Oval Office. AdWeek offers one interesting perspective on the Barack cartoon saying that advertisers should be thrilled.
Meanwhile, within this world of minute media issues that are sensationalized enough to fill a full 24-hour news cycle, are there any lessons to be learned from this latest New Yorker kerfuffle? No. 1: I think that the magazine's advertisers should be thrilled. Any cover that through sheer cleverness generates this kind of attention is to be worshiped.Get the rest of the story here. Thoughts? Comment below.













